Case study · Iran · 2 min read, approximately

Hajji Firuz: painted pottery and contact with Mesopotamia

A single sentence in the Met's timeline links Hajji Firuz, about 6000-5000 BCE, to sites in Mesopotamia. What the resemblance shows, and what it cannot prove.

The explanations distinguish finds, interpretations and open questions. Sources appear at the end of the page.

What the source says

In the key events of the Met's timeline for Iran, under about 6000-5000 BCE, the text reads: "Painted pottery and figurines from Hajji Firuz are similar to those found at sites in Mesopotamia, indicating contact between distant settlements." That is all the page says about the site: it does not locate Hajji Firuz within Iran, does not describe the figurines and does not name the sites in Mesopotamia. Source 1.

From resemblance to contact

The sentence has two parts, an observation and an inference. The observation is a resemblance between vessels and figures from two regions; the inference, "indicating contact", is the interpretation of the timeline's authors. The source does not say what kind of contact it was (trade, movement of people, or transmission of ideas and skills), in which direction the style travelled, or whether the vessels themselves moved. Source 1.

What resemblance does not settle

Stylistic resemblance alone does not prove where a vessel was made. A painted vessel found at Hajji Firuz may be local and resemble Mesopotamian ones, or it may be imported; the timeline's sentence does not distinguish between these possibilities. Deciding depends on information the page does not give: what raw material the vessel is made of, where and in what context it was found, and which vessels it was compared with. The article "Materials and exchange: reading connections between places" sets out on this site the distinction between the source of the raw material, the place of manufacture, the place of use and the findspot.

The dating and its place on the site

The range "ca. 6000-5000 B.C." lies entirely within the same timeline's Pottery Neolithic, about 7500-5000 BCE, and its end touches the start of the Chalcolithic there, about 5000 BCE. The article is therefore placed on the Neolithic in Iran. The comparison with sites in Mesopotamia does not move Hajji Firuz into the Mesopotamian scheme: each region on this site has its own frame, and the same millennium can carry different names in each. Source 1.

Scope of reading: the Met timeline page "Iran, 8000-2000 B.C." was read on 24 October 2026. Excavation reports of Hajji Firuz and publications on its pottery were not read, so this page gives no location for the site, no levels, no vessel counts and no description of the figurines.

Source

Sources and further reading

The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.

  1. 1 Iran, 8000-2000 B.C.

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · 2000 · Checked

Continue from here

Follow the next connection

Every card comes from a documented relation or an editorial link. The reason line explains the connection.

The two earliest entries in the Met's timeline for Iran: the domestication of sheep and goats at Ali Kosh about 8000 BCE, and clay vessels and terracotta figurines at Ganj Dareh in the 8th millennium. What they establish, and what they leave unsaid.

3 min read, approximately

Related reading.

Reading, accessibility & privacy tools

Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.