Case study · Anatolia · 3 min read, approximately

The earliest coinage: a Lydian ruler, possibly Croesus

The Met's timeline credits the invention of coinage to a Lydian ruler, "possibly Croesus". The sentence is short, but its dates do not fully agree with one another, and that is what this article examines.

The explanations distinguish finds, interpretations and open questions. Sources appear at the end of the page.

What the source says

In the Met's Heilbrunn Timeline for Anatolia and the Caucasus, 1000 B.C.-1 A.D., the key event headed "7th-early 6th century B.C." reads: "The earliest coinage is invented by a Lydian ruler, possibly Croesus (r. ca. 560-546 B.C.)." The chronology chart on the same page lists the "Lydian kingdom" at ca. 685-547 B.C. In the overview, Lydia appears, "(later)", among the small kingdoms that the Neo-Assyrian empire confronts by the late eighth century B.C. Source 1.

Two ranges in one sentence

The entry's heading dates the invention to the 7th-early 6th century BCE, while the reign the source gives Croesus, ca. 560-546 BCE, falls in the middle of the 6th century, after its "early" part. The heading therefore allows an invention as early as the 7th century, long before Croesus, while the attribution "possibly Croesus" points to a later date. The source does not reconcile the two, and the word "possibly" marks the attribution as uncertain. There is also a one-year difference between the end of Croesus's reign (ca. 546) and the end of the Lydian kingdom in the chart (ca. 547); both dates are approximate. Source 1.

Where this sits on the timeline

On this site, the Iron Age in Anatolia runs approximately 1200-550 BCE, and the Achaemenid period begins in 547 BCE. The range of the invention, 7th-early 6th century, lies entirely within the Iron Age, whereas Croesus's reign crosses the boundary between the two periods. The article is therefore placed in the Iron Age by the range of the invention as the source words it, not by Croesus's reign. Source 1.

What cannot be learned from this

The source says nothing about the coins themselves: it gives no metal, weight, image, mint or findspot, and describes no particular coin. Nor does it explain on what grounds the invention is attributed to a Lydian ruler. A reader who wants to know which coins are meant needs a numismatic catalogue, a museum record or an excavation report, none of which was read for this article. Source 1.

On this site

The article "Coins and hoards: date, context and economy" explains how a minting date constrains the date of an archaeological context without fixing its exact year. It deals with later coins and does not discuss Lydia, so it complements this article with questions of method, not with an answer to who invented coinage.

Scope of reading: the Met timeline page for Anatolia and the Caucasus, 1000 B.C.-1 A.D., was read on 24 October 2026. No numismatic catalogue, excavation report or museum record of an early Lydian coin was read, so the article describes the claim in the timeline, not the coins themselves.

Source

Sources and further reading

The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.

  1. 1 Anatolia and the Caucasus (Asia Minor), 1000 B.C.-1 A.D. (Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, chronology)

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · Checked

Continue from here

Follow the next connection

Every card comes from a documented relation or an editorial link. The reason line explains the connection.

At Gordion in central Türkiye, according to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, an Iron Age fortified gate complex, coloured floor mosaics and burial mounds survive. What is dated, by whom, and what remains open.

3 min read, approximately

Related reading.

Reading, accessibility & privacy tools

Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.