Site · Egypt · 3 min read, approximately

Merimde Beni Salama: a human face from the Delta

The Met's timeline states that a representation of a human face from Merimde Beni Salama in the Delta "is the earliest known example of sculpture from ancient Egypt". What the sentence tells us, and what it lacks for any discussion of the figure itself.

The explanations distinguish finds, interpretations and open questions. Sources appear at the end of the page.

What the source says

In the key events of the Neolithic (about 7000-4500 BCE) on the Met's timeline for Egypt, the text says that "at the site of Merimde Beni Salama in the Delta, a representation of a human face is the earliest known example of sculpture from ancient Egypt". In the same entry the source describes the period as the one to which "the earliest permanent settlements" belong, identified from the remains of huts, hearths, granaries and nonportable stone tools for grinding grains, and adds that tools of bone and ceramic vessels were now used alongside stone tools. Source 1.

A site that crosses periods

Merimde appears in the same source a second time, in the entry for the Badarian Period (about 4500-3800 BCE): most sites of that period are cemeteries in the low desert of the Nile valley, but the Delta site of Merimde Beni Salama is "the largest known in Egypt" from that time. UCL's Digital Egypt adds that the Fayum Neolithic, dated there about 5200-4000 BCE, is contemporary with the Neolithic culture of Merimde and in many ways connected with it. The article is therefore placed in two of the site's periods: the Neolithic, where the source places the face, and the Predynastic, in whose first phase it names Merimde as the largest known site. Sources 1, 2.

What the sentence does not say

The source gives a description and a superlative, nothing more. It does not state the material of the representation, its size, where on the site it was found or in which layer; its place in the Neolithic entry is the only dating it gives, and that is the date of the whole entry, about 7000-4500 BCE, not a date for the find. "Earliest known" is the source's claim, and the word "known" matters: it describes the state of knowledge and does not establish that no earlier figures were made. Source 1.

A human image and the question of meaning

What an early human representation can teach, about belief, identity or ritual, is not answered in the sources read. To discuss it one would need to know exactly where the representation was found - in a house, a pit, a grave or fill - next to which objects, and in which phase of the site. Until the excavation publication is read, one can say only that the Met places a representation of a human face from Merimde in the Neolithic and regards it as the earliest known example of sculpture from ancient Egypt. Source 1.

Scope of reading: the Met's timeline page for Egypt, 8000-2000 BCE, and the page "Fayum Neolithic" in UCL's Digital Egypt were read on 24 October 2026. The excavation publications of Merimde and any museum record of the representation itself were not read, so this page gives no physical description of it, no date of its own and no present location.

Source

Sources and further reading

The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.

  1. 1 Egypt, 8000-2000 B.C. (Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, chronology)

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · 2000 · Checked

  2. 2 Fayum Neolithic

    University College London (Digital Egypt) · Checked

Continue from here

Follow the next connection

Every card comes from a documented relation or an editorial link. The reason line explains the connection.

UCL's Digital Egypt calls the Fayum Neolithic "the earliest securely attested full Neolithic culture in Egypt" and dates its sites to about 5200-4000 BCE. What stands behind the label, and what the source does not say.

3 min read, approximately

Related reading.

Most known sites of the Badarian Period (about 4500-3800 BCE) are cemeteries in the low desert. According to the Met's timeline they reveal a "formal burial program"; what the source does not infer from them matters as much.

3 min read, approximately

Related reading.

METHOD GUIDE · EVIDENCE & INTERPRETATION

How to read archaeological research

A practical route from question to evidence and from evidence to interpretation. You do not need to know every technical term to begin reading carefully.

4 min read, approximately

Related reading.

Reading, accessibility & privacy tools

Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.