PERIOD GUIDE · The Levant

The Babylonian period: Judah and Benjamin after 586

The frame of 586-539 BCE, from the fall of Jerusalem to the start of Persian rule, is drawn here for Judah and Benjamin only, not for the whole Levant. Two research cases ask what remained in Jerusalem after the destruction and what continued at Mizpah and in Benjamin.

Approximately 586-539 BCE

Sites and objects of the period on this site

Schematic map: Jerusalem: objects within a city Mediterranean SeaDead SeaSea of GalileeJordanNegevGalilee Jerusalem Haifa Beersheba Tyre
  • Jerusalem: objects within a cityThe place

Schematic map: simplified coastlines, not to scale; positions follow the cited records.

Move through the periods

Its place in the The Levant scheme

The whole scheme with this period marked; the periods before and after are its neighbours in the row. Boundaries follow the sources and are not to scale.

All periods and subdivisions
  1. The Neolithic10,000-5,500 BCE
  2. The Chalcolithic5,500-3,300 BCE
  3. The Bronze Age3,300-1,200 BCE
  4. The Iron Age1,200-586 BCE
  5. The Babylonian period586-539 BCE
  6. The Persian period539-331 BCE
  7. The Hellenistic period331-64 BCE
  8. The Roman period64 BCE - 330 CE
  9. The Byzantine period330-640 CE
  10. The early Islamic period640-1,099 CE
  11. The Middle Ages1,099-1,516 CE

The frame

On this site the Iron Age page ends in 586 BCE and the Persian period page begins in 539 BCE. This page fills the gap, and its frame is Judah and Benjamin only. Both boundaries appear in the Met's timeline for the eastern Mediterranean and Syria, on which the site's Levant period pages draw: there Iron Age II is dated about 1000-586 BCE, and Persian rule under the Achaemenid dynasty about 539-331 BCE. Under the key events of 587/586 BCE the timeline states that Jerusalem, the capital of the kingdom of Judah, fell to the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II, who deported a significant part of the population to Babylon. Source 1.

Boundaries and overlaps

586 is a Judahite date, not a boundary for the whole region. For the region as a whole the same timeline has a separate line, "Babylonian rule, ca. 606-539 B.C.", and its overview says that with the fall of the Assyrian empire at the end of the seventh century BCE the Neo-Babylonian empire claimed the region. The years between about 606 and 586, which the timeline already counts as Babylonian rule, therefore remain on the Iron Age page. The same overview speaks of "only fifty years of rule by the Babylonians" before the region was incorporated into the Achaemenid Persian empire: a round figure, closer to 586-539 than to the roughly 67 years of the regional line, and the page does not reconcile the two. The end is marked by the key events of 539-525 BCE: Cyrus the Great releases captive peoples, including the Jews, and allows them to return to their homelands. Source 1.

Phases that cross the boundaries

Within Judah and Benjamin, too, local phases do not stop at the page's boundaries. According to Oded Lipschits, Tell en-Nasbeh, that is Mizpah, served as the capital (bîrah) for 141 years, from 586 BCE until the time of Nehemiah (445 BCE), that is, for decades into the Persian period. Source 3. Liora Freud describes the pottery of "Babylonian Stratum 9/10" in the City of David as a transitional assemblage of the 6th century BCE: vessels made before the 586 destruction continued in use, and completely new types appear only toward the end of the century, at the beginning of the Persian period. Source 2.

On this site

Two articles are placed in this period. "Jerusalem's pottery: a transitional assemblage of the Babylonian period" asks whether Jerusalem was entirely abandoned after 586, on the evidence of bowls that are neither typical of the Iron Age nor typically Persian. "Mizpah and Benjamin: the seat of rule under Babylon" separates excavation data, a demographic model and an administrative interpretation in the question of whether the seat of rule moved from Jerusalem to Mizpah. Together they show both sides of the question in the title of Lipschits's chapter, Judah as an "Empty Land": destruction and the decline of urban life, alongside settlement continuity in Benjamin. Source 3. No museum object on the site is assigned to this period yet.

Source

Sources and further reading

The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.

  1. 1 The Eastern Mediterranean and Syria, 1000 B.C.-1 A.D.

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · 2000 · Checked

  2. 2 The pottery of Jerusalem in the Babylonian period (article in Tel Aviv, 2023; descriptive title)

    Liora Freud · 2023 · Checked

  3. 3 Shedding New Light on the Dark Years of the 'Exilic Period': New Studies, Further Elucidation, and Some Questions Regarding the Archaeology of Judah as an 'Empty Land'

    Oded Lipschits · 2011 · Checked

Reading, accessibility & privacy tools

Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.