PERIOD GUIDE · The Levant

The Middle Ages: building, water and reuse

Explore medieval Jerusalem and the fountain house at Nazareth through building phases, maintenance and patronage alongside changes of government.

Approximately 1099-1516 CE

Sites and objects of the period on this site

Schematic map: Jerusalem: objects within a city, Nazareth: place, house and sequence Mediterranean SeaDead SeaSea of GalileeJordanNegevGalilee Jerusalem Nazareth Haifa Beersheba Tyre
  • Jerusalem: objects within a cityThe place
  • Nazareth: place, house and sequenceThe place

Schematic map: simplified coastlines, not to scale; positions follow the cited records.

Move through the periods

Its place in the The Levant scheme

The whole scheme with this period marked; the periods before and after are its neighbours in the row. Boundaries follow the sources and are not to scale.

All periods and subdivisions
  1. The Neolithic10,000-5,500 BCE
  2. The Chalcolithic5,500-3,300 BCE
  3. The Bronze Age3,300-1,200 BCE
  4. The Iron Age1,200-586 BCE
  5. The Babylonian period586-539 BCE
  6. The Persian period539-331 BCE
  7. The Hellenistic period331-64 BCE
  8. The Roman period64 BCE - 330 CE
  9. The Byzantine period330-640 CE
  10. The early Islamic period640-1,099 CE
  11. The Middle Ages1,099-1,516 CE

Overlapping periods on one map

The approximate range 1099-1516 CE introduces Crusader, Ayyubid and Mamluk periods here. These are not successive boxes into which the whole region moved together. Timeline 1 shows Crusader kingdoms overlapping with Ayyubid and Mamluk rule. A date and a place therefore matter more than the broad label “medieval”.

In an excavation report, check whether “Crusader” describes local political rule, a building style or a group of pottery. Each usage may be valid, but moving between them requires explanation. Calling a gateway Mamluk does not prove that the whole street was rebuilt then; identifying a vessel as imported does not establish its user’s origins.

Nazareth’s fountain house: construction and alteration

The public description of the Mary’s Well study identifies a fountain house built during the Crusader period and substantially altered under the Mamluks. Source 3. This is a defined claim about one building sequence, not a complete account of Nazareth. The description and contents were checked for this page; the full monograph was not examined.

The case suggests a useful exercise in reading water architecture. Separate the water source, its conveyance, the collecting area and the place approached by users. Change in one component does not require change in every other. Determining what was repaired and when needs a phased plan, wall relationships and contextual evidence; a publication title cannot supply these missing details.

Jerusalem: buildings with more than one phase

1 describes Crusader work at the Holy Sepulchre incorporating earlier fabric. For later centuries, 2 identifies the fifteenth-century Ashrafiyya madrasa and Qaitbay’s fountain in Jerusalem. These offer different starting points for investigating patronage, use and urban appearance, rather than a collection of chronologically uniform buildings.

A photograph of a standing monument can make several periods appear to form one coherent whole. First mark the observations: changed stone dressing, a joint, a blocked opening or an inserted inscription. Then check the research interpretation of each. A visible difference might reflect new construction, repair or conservation; by itself it does not identify a dynasty.

Where do the Middle Ages end?

2 places the Ottoman conquest of Syria and Egypt in 1516-1517. This guide uses 1516 as a regional navigation boundary. It does not follow that local crafts, water supplies or domestic occupation stopped in that year. Moving between period pages should preserve room for processes whose duration differs from political change.

Start with the Jerusalem and Nazareth pages, then follow the evidence underpinning a claim: inscription, pottery or a building detail. At each step, record what is dated and what remains uncertain. A building’s history can then include construction, adaptation and maintenance instead of shrinking to a single period label. The research-reading guide explains the difference between consulting a short public description and examining a full excavation report.

Source

Sources and further reading

The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.

  1. 1 The Eastern Mediterranean, 1000-1400 A.D.

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · 2001 · Checked

  2. 2 The Eastern Mediterranean, 1400-1600 A.D.

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art · 2002 · Checked

  3. 3 Mary’s Well, Nazareth: The Late Hellenistic to the Ottoman Periods

    Yardenna Alexandre · 2012 · Checked

Reading, accessibility & privacy tools

Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.